Showing posts with label Convergence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Convergence. Show all posts

Friday, 14 October 2011

Convergence Part 2













 “Convergence can be defined as the dynamic approach or partial integration of different communication and information-based market applications. A further aspect of convergence is that it brings out integrated multimedia products and services that render possible the satisfaction of additional and multiple consumer preferences.”
                                                                                                Gracie Lawson-Borders, 2006

As the internet breaks all distance boundaries in communication, most media organisations have become part of this network, whereby convergence between broadcast, print and online news is the norm, meaning consumers have access to voice, print and video from anywhere at any time.

There are obvious negatives to this type of media convergence, which I discussed in my last blog post. However there are definite positives as well; media convergence leaves room for many technologies to co-exist. Whilst there has been much hype about the so called ‘death of the newspaper’ and major ratings losses for broadcast providers, these mediums do still exist and probably won’t ever be replaced whilst democracy and choice exist. 

There are people embracing online content to the point they feel they don’t need other mediums to gather news content, however there will always be people who choose to read the newspaper, watch television news, listen to a radio bulletin, because these mediums are more convenient for them (journalists included). Networking just allows media organisations to meet a broader audience in a variety of ways.

According to Media organizations and convergence: case studies of media convergence pioneers, by Gracie Lawson-Borders, ‘a survey by the Pew Centre for Civic Journalism in 2000 found that 9 out of 10 editors from 360 newspapers stated that more interactivity with readers was key to the future of their business.’

Getting off topic a little, the book mentions one of the most ironic examples of convergence: the success of Amazon.com  in using an electronic medium to sell one of the oldest mediums, books. Another successful example of convergence (related to journalism this time, I promise) is the combination of The Wall Street Journal and www.wsj.com, where the company asked consumers to subscribe to the online content in 1996 and by 2003 had more people accessing the print and online content than ever before (2.6 million to be precise). You can read more examples in the book (linked here).

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

Junction Point

"Convergence (in online journalism)

1. Combining of media: the internet’s fusion of video, text and sound.
      2. Merging of media organisations: a newspaper and a television station can combine their news-gathering resources into a single entity, with journalists producing content for broadcast, print and the internet."

                                                                                                               - James C. Foust, 2009

Problems? 

If the media is supposed to be forming the fourth estate, whereby it takes on a ‘watchdog’ role over industry, government, etcetera, how will it be able to perform this role in an impartial way? Not only will it have the competing interested of advertisers, it will also have the competing interests of different news organisations and their agendas.

I guess it’s kind of a similar situation to that which commercial news providers are in; they need advertising in order to produce news content, yet does providing this advertising present a bias towards the industries and companies that pay for their commercials to be integrated into or around news content? 

This is only a look into one small problem that will occur with convergence. The second of numerous problems is the policy and lawmaking (the details of which I’m shaky on) which apply to broadcasters but as yet don’t apply to internet news agencies regarding content, censorship and many other issues. If television news broadcasters and radio broadcasters are subject to certain rules and regulations, shouldn’t there be similar rules and regulations for internet organisations? 

Here’s a great article discussing some of the issues which are arising: 


No doubt convergence also has its benefits...